A murderer's bookshelf: Hannity, O'Reilly, and Savage on killer's reading list
Submitted by jonathan on Tue, 2008-07-29 11:01
by R.J. Eskow, Night Light
This morning I wrote that Sean Hannity et al. might bear some share of moral responsibility for the killings in Knoxville. Sadly for everyone concerned, that may be true.
This evening we learn from the Knoxville News that officers entering the home of murder Jim Adkisson "found Liberalism is a Mental Health Disorder by radio talk show host Michael Savage, Let Freedom Ring by talk show host Sean Hannity, and The O'Reilly Factor, by television talk show host Bill O'Reilly."
The presence of somebody's books in a mentally disturbed person's home does not make them accessories to a killing. But right-wing rhetoric toward liberals and humanists like those who attended the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church has been exceptionally violent for years. Liberal groups are often called "Nazi" or "Nazi-like" by O'Reilly (he even said that about our own Arianna Huffington). Savage says he'd "hang every lawyer" who tried to establish constitutional rights for Guantanamo prisoners, describes Obama as an "Afro-Leninist," and said the folks at Media Matters were "brownshirts." He describes Rep. Wexler as a "Nazi" and calls Nancy Pelosi a "Mussolini."
As for Hannity, he said that "there are things in life worth fighting and dying for and one of 'em is making sure Nancy Pelosidoesn't become the speaker (of the House)." Think about it: "worth fighting and dying for."
And that's just a sampler.
Ann Coulter says liberals should be beaten with baseball bats and tried for treason (she's not clear about the order in which these events are to take place.) Dick Morris says they're "traitors" who should be decapitated.
I had a friend at Clear Channel (yes, I have a broad group of friends) who described some of these people as "entertainers." Don't you get it, guys? You use inflammatory images that equates your fellow Americans with violent enemies of the nation. Then you act surprised when a mentally ill person believes you and kills. You use the language of war and then say you're not to blame when somebody enlists in your imaginary struggle.
Their next step will be outrage - outrage! - at the idea that they may be morally accountable for this action, the possible fruit of their rhetoric.
We all need to be thoughtful about the impact of our words. But the Right has made it their business to promote a particularly virulent brand of hatred. Would Jim Adkisson have killed without all that prompting from the vituperative chorus of the right? We'll never know. But it's looking less likely with every passing hour that he would ever have entered a church filled with children and started shooting.
If they found something I wrote in a killer's home, I'd stop what I was doing and begin some serious self-reflection. I'd write about it, consider my errors, and try to make amends. Wouldn't you? Not that censorship is the answer. Not every reprehensible act can be legislated away. Sometimes the most effective way to change people is to hold them accountable. That includes not only Fox News, in this case, but also CNN - who recently gave the anchor chair to hate-speaker Glenn Beck.
Guys, it's not "entertainment" any more - if it ever was. We need to hold those in the boardroom accountable, too. They make their money and serve their political agenda by telling hundreds of millions of people that liberal Americans are treacherous and mentally ill enemies of the state. And they use the public airwaves to do it.
If these right-wing pundits are as devout as they say they are they'll stop, think, and ask forgiveness. That goes for their corporate paymasters, too. I hope they do for their own sakes, though I don't expect it.
As for the rest of us, it's time to look at new strategies for containing the spread of hate speech in our media. The old ways aren't working.
article originally published at .»
- Login or register to post comments
- |
- Post to Twitter


Right Wing Pundits
I understand Michelle Malkin already has comments on her web site claiming, "You know what I think? He didn’t hate liberals. He hated Christians. He wanted to leave the impression that he is conservative who hates liberals, however, to discredit conservatives." I took a look at her site and this is one of the more rational comments.
As a Unitarian Universalist I am appalled that anyone could actually think that a Liberal would go on a shooting spree at the Liberal church to discredit conservatives. It is the Conservative Pundits who are always advocating murder of anyone who disagrees with them.
I know a lot of Liberals and not one of them would ever think of saying that Conservatives should be shoot. We may not agree with the Conservatives policies but we separate the policies from the person making the policy suggestions.
As a Vietnam vet I am only too aware of the danger of confusing the soldier with the war they fought in. Back in the Vietnam era it was the "Conservatives" advocating respect for the troops. Most Liberals learned the lesson after the Vietnam War passions died down. The "Conservatives" have still not learned this lesson.
John H
Lebanon, PA
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time,
and your government when it deserves it. --Mark Twain
I hope the shooter uses the "bad influence" defense
Right wingers are always talking about how gays, heavy metal, and anything else they don't like is going to corrupt young minds merely because it is allowed to exist, and people are allowed to know its existence is tolerated.
Therefore, it would be appropriate if this demented shooter used a "Savage, Coulter, and Hannity made me do it" defense and see how the righties howl.
Of course they will contradict all their own earlier arguments since consistency is not the issue, it is winning at all costs.
So when Clinton lies about oral sex, it is an impeachable offense, but when Bush lies about the threat from Iraq and launches a war that kills over a million people, it's no big deal.
Or maybe Clinton's sin was that his lie didn't didn't put money in any oil company or defense contractors' pockets.
Tim McVeigh's anti-gov't views also like right wing talkers
The scariest thing for me about the Bush years was that before 9/11, I thought people like Ann Coulter, Savage, and Rush were engaging in hyperbole.
Then after 9/11, Bush closed most of the gap between their rhetoric and his actions, and it wasn't so funny anymore.
For a while I wondered if the right wing talkers would pull the same trick talk radio did in Rwanda and tell their followers to go out and kill their domestic enemies like cockroaches.
Savage, Hannity, & O'Reilly
If pornography found at the home of Ted Bundy can be used as evidence of the harmful effects of pornography, then so can right-wing propaganda be used as evidence of violence prone behavior here.